2025 CFP Team Rating Profiles (through Week 11)
2025 :: 2024 :: 2023 :: 2022 :: 2021 :: 2020 :: 2019 :: 2018 :: 2017 :: 2016 :: 2015 :: 2014 :: 2013 :: 2012 :: 2011 :: 2010 :: 2009 :: 2008 :: 2007
College Football Playoff (CFP) rankings are produced by the selection committee responsible for assigning teams to the national championship playoff bracket. Teams selected to the 12-team field are asterisked. FEI ratings represent opponent-adjusted per possession scoring efficiency. Strength of record ratings are the difference between actual wins and expected wins against the schedule for an elite team (EWD), a good team (GWD), and an average team (AWD). Record splits include records against FEI top-10 (v10), top-20 (v20), top-30 (v30), top-40 (v40), top-50 (v50), top-60 (v60), and against all other opponents (vO).
| CFP | Team | Rec | FBS | FEI | Rk | EWD | Rk | GWD | Rk | AWD | Rk | v10 | v20 | v30 | v40 | v50 | v60 | vO | ||
| 1 | Ohio State | 9-0 | 8-0 | 1.54 | 2 | .72 | 3 | 2.66 | 5 | 5.37 | 4 | - | 2-0 | 4-0 | 4-0 | 4-0 | 4-0 | 5-0 | ||
| 2 | Indiana | 10-0 | 9-0 | 1.59 | 1 | 1.29 | 1 | 3.25 | 3 | 5.86 | 2 | 1-0 | 3-0 | 4-0 | 4-0 | 4-0 | 5-0 | 5-0 | ||
| 3 | Texas A&M | 9-0 | 9-0 | 1.15 | 9 | 1.19 | 2 | 3.60 | 1 | 6.51 | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 4-0 | 5-0 | 7-0 | 7-0 | 2-0 | ||
| 4 | Alabama | 8-1 | 8-1 | 1.21 | 7 | .62 | 4 | 3.29 | 2 | 5.76 | 3 | 1-0 | 3-0 | 5-1 | 6-1 | 6-1 | 6-1 | 2-0 | ||
| 5 | Georgia | 8-1 | 7-1 | 1.29 | 4 | .40 | 5 | 2.85 | 4 | 5.32 | 5 | 0-1 | 2-1 | 3-1 | 4-1 | 6-1 | 6-1 | 2-0 | ||
| 6 | Texas Tech | 9-1 | 8-1 | 1.17 | 8 | .05 | 9 | 1.98 | 7 | 4.16 | 8 | 1-0 | 2-0 | 3-1 | 4-1 | 4-1 | 5-1 | 4-0 | ||
| 7 | Ole Miss | 9-1 | 8-1 | .94 | 12 | .23 | 7 | 2.45 | 6 | 5.09 | 6 | 0-1 | 1-1 | 2-1 | 3-1 | 5-1 | 5-1 | 4-0 | ||
| 8 | Oregon | 8-1 | 7-1 | 1.40 | 3 | .26 | 6 | 1.68 | 9 | 3.53 | 12 | 0-1 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 3-1 | 5-0 | ||
| 9 | Notre Dame | 7-2 | 7-2 | 1.22 | 6 | -.82 | 13 | 1.21 | 13 | 3.87 | 10 | 0-2 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 4-2 | 3-0 | ||
| 10 | Texas | 7-2 | 7-2 | .84 | 16 | -.45 | 10 | 1.51 | 12 | 3.53 | 14 | 0-1 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 3-1 | 4-2 | 4-2 | 3-0 | ||
| 11 | Oklahoma | 7-2 | 6-2 | .92 | 14 | -.78 | 12 | 1.54 | 11 | 3.63 | 11 | - | 2-2 | 3-2 | 4-2 | 4-2 | 4-2 | 3-0 | ||
| 12 | BYU | 8-1 | 7-1 | .78 | 18 | .18 | 8 | 1.89 | 8 | 4.24 | 7 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 3-1 | 3-1 | 4-1 | 4-0 | ||
| 13 | Utah | 7-2 | 6-2 | 1.23 | 5 | -1.07 | 18 | .69 | 17 | 3.13 | 16 | 0-1 | 0-2 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 5-0 | ||
| 14 | Vanderbilt | 8-2 | 7-2 | .94 | 11 | -.68 | 11 | 1.65 | 10 | 4.07 | 9 | 0-1 | 0-2 | 3-2 | 4-2 | 4-2 | 4-2 | 4-0 | ||
| 15 | Miami | 7-2 | 6-2 | .95 | 10 | -1.09 | 20 | .85 | 14 | 3.53 | 13 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 2-0 | 3-2 | 4-2 | 4-2 | 3-0 | ||
| 16 | Georgia Tech | 8-1 | 7-1 | .36 | 44 | -.87 | 16 | .14 | 25 | 2.85 | 19 | - | - | - | - | 1-0 | 3-1 | 5-0 | ||
| 17 | USC | 7-2 | 7-2 | .93 | 13 | -1.02 | 17 | .73 | 16 | 3.12 | 17 | 0-1 | 1-1 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 3-2 | 4-0 | ||
| 18 | Michigan | 7-2 | 7-2 | .71 | 19 | -1.16 | 21 | .65 | 18 | 3.31 | 15 | - | 0-2 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 5-0 | ||
| 19 | Virginia | 8-2 | 7-2 | .29 | 47 | -1.75 | 33 | -.54 | 35 | 2.31 | 26 | - | - | 1-0 | 2-0 | 2-0 | 2-2 | 6-0 | ||
| 20 | Louisville | 7-2 | 6-2 | .42 | 38 | -1.49 | 29 | -.15 | 27 | 2.17 | 30 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 2-0 | 3-1 | 3-1 | 4-1 | ||
| 21 | Iowa | 6-3 | 5-3 | .89 | 15 | -1.32 | 25 | .27 | 23 | 2.16 | 31 | 0-2 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 1-3 | 1-3 | 1-3 | 5-0 | ||
| 22 | Pittsburgh | 7-2 | 6-2 | .46 | 33 | -1.76 | 34 | -.80 | 40 | 1.53 | 40 | - | - | 1-0 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 2-1 | 5-1 | ||
| 23 | Tennessee | 6-3 | 5-3 | .82 | 17 | -1.43 | 28 | .60 | 19 | 2.60 | 21 | 0-2 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 1-3 | 3-3 | 3-3 | 3-0 | ||
| 24 | South Florida | 7-2 | 6-2 | .46 | 34 | -1.54 | 30 | -.21 | 28 | 2.00 | 32 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 3-2 | 4-0 | ||
| 25 | Cincinnati | 7-2 | 6-2 | .56 | 25 | -1.17 | 22 | .56 | 20 | 2.84 | 20 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-2 | 2-2 | 3-2 | 4-2 | 3-0 |